<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democracy &amp; poverty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tradediversion.net/archives/2006/11/democracy-poverty.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tradediversion.net/archives/2006/11/democracy-poverty.html</link>
	<description>Commentary on development, globalization, and trade by Jonathan Dingel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:03:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dingel</title>
		<link>http://www.tradediversion.net/archives/2006/11/democracy-poverty.html/comment-page-1#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Dingel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 02:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradediversion.net/?p=329#comment-122</guid>
		<description>From the Michael Ross paper (second link):

We use two alternative measures of regime type. One is based on the Polity IV dataset, which contains separate 0– 10 measures of democracy and authoritarianism for each country-year; following standard practice, we combine these two measures to produce a 21-point scale, which we call POLITY.
The other measure allows for a country’s history of democratic rule to influence its infant and child mortality rates. Several recent studies suggest that new democracies perform less well than established ones (Keefer and Vlaicu 2005; McGuire 2006). A state with 50 years of democratic experience, for example, might reduce infant mortality more quickly (or slowly) than a country with just one year of democratic experience.13 To explore this possibility, we use a variable that is based on the total number of years that each country has been a democracy, beginning in 1900; we take the natural log of this figure (DEMOCRATIC YEARS) to capture the intuition that the marginal benefits of democracy will diminish over time.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Michael Ross paper (second link):</p>
<p>We use two alternative measures of regime type. One is based on the Polity IV dataset, which contains separate 0– 10 measures of democracy and authoritarianism for each country-year; following standard practice, we combine these two measures to produce a 21-point scale, which we call POLITY.<br />
The other measure allows for a country’s history of democratic rule to influence its infant and child mortality rates. Several recent studies suggest that new democracies perform less well than established ones (Keefer and Vlaicu 2005; McGuire 2006). A state with 50 years of democratic experience, for example, might reduce infant mortality more quickly (or slowly) than a country with just one year of democratic experience.13 To explore this possibility, we use a variable that is based on the total number of years that each country has been a democracy, beginning in 1900; we take the natural log of this figure (DEMOCRATIC YEARS) to capture the intuition that the marginal benefits of democracy will diminish over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrique Avogadro</title>
		<link>http://www.tradediversion.net/archives/2006/11/democracy-poverty.html/comment-page-1#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrique Avogadro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 02:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradediversion.net/?p=329#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Democracy being what exactly?!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democracy being what exactly?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
