<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NAFTA Numbers: Cheap Calculations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tradediversion.net/archives/2008/03/nafta-numbers-cheap-calculations.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tradediversion.net/archives/2008/03/nafta-numbers-cheap-calculations.html</link>
	<description>Commentary on development, globalization, and trade by Jonathan Dingel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:16:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.tradediversion.net/archives/2008/03/nafta-numbers-cheap-calculations.html/comment-page-1#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 05:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradediversion.net/?p=792#comment-246</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t clear after reading Levy&#039;s piece whether the statement that trade doesn&#039;t affect the number of jobs comes from trade theory or is more a matter of &quot;because the Fed won&#039;t let it affect the number of jobs&quot;, which is obviously different.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t clear after reading Levy&#8217;s piece whether the statement that trade doesn&#8217;t affect the number of jobs comes from trade theory or is more a matter of &#8220;because the Fed won&#8217;t let it affect the number of jobs&#8221;, which is obviously different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

