<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Easterly on Collier, again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tradediversion.net/archives/2008/11/easterly-on-collier-again.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tradediversion.net/archives/2008/11/easterly-on-collier-again.html</link>
	<description>Commentary on development, globalization, and trade by Jonathan Dingel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:56:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luis Enrique</title>
		<link>http://www.tradediversion.net/archives/2008/11/easterly-on-collier-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Enrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradediversion.net/?p=993#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Collier&#039;s econometrics is a bit dodgy, mainly because of small sample problems imho, but Easterly comes across as cavalier himself ... because Collier does discuss the problems of establishing causation, controlling for omitted variables etc. but you wouldn&#039;t know that to read Easterly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Collier&#8217;s econometrics is a bit dodgy, mainly because of small sample problems imho, but Easterly comes across as cavalier himself &#8230; because Collier does discuss the problems of establishing causation, controlling for omitted variables etc. but you wouldn&#8217;t know that to read Easterly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
