<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arkolakis, Costinot, and Rodriguez-Clare: &#8220;New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tradediversion.net/archives/2010/01/arkolakis-costinot-and-rodriguez-clare-new-trade-models-same-old-gains.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tradediversion.net/archives/2010/01/arkolakis-costinot-and-rodriguez-clare-new-trade-models-same-old-gains.html</link>
	<description>Commentary on development, globalization, and trade by Jonathan Dingel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:16:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Agent Continuum</title>
		<link>http://www.tradediversion.net/archives/2010/01/arkolakis-costinot-and-rodriguez-clare-new-trade-models-same-old-gains.html/comment-page-1#comment-3422</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent Continuum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradediversion.net/?p=1588#comment-3422</guid>
		<description>Sorry, my fault.

I can&#039;t imagine, though, what it would mean to cut most countries off from world oil markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, my fault.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t imagine, though, what it would mean to cut most countries off from world oil markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdingel</title>
		<link>http://www.tradediversion.net/archives/2010/01/arkolakis-costinot-and-rodriguez-clare-new-trade-models-same-old-gains.html/comment-page-1#comment-3421</link>
		<dc:creator>jdingel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradediversion.net/?p=1588#comment-3421</guid>
		<description>They say:

&quot;We then use our assumption that epsilon is constant across equilibria to integrate small changes in real income between the initial trade equilibrium and the autarky equilibrium. This allows us to establish that the total size of the gains from trade, i.e. the percentage change in real income necessary to compensate a representative consumer for going to autarky, is equal to lambda^(1/epsilon)-1.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They say:</p>
<p>&#8220;We then use our assumption that epsilon is constant across equilibria to integrate small changes in real income between the initial trade equilibrium and the autarky equilibrium. This allows us to establish that the total size of the gains from trade, i.e. the percentage change in real income necessary to compensate a representative consumer for going to autarky, is equal to lambda^(1/epsilon)-1.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent Continuum</title>
		<link>http://www.tradediversion.net/archives/2010/01/arkolakis-costinot-and-rodriguez-clare-new-trade-models-same-old-gains.html/comment-page-1#comment-3420</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent Continuum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradediversion.net/?p=1588#comment-3420</guid>
		<description>The thing that might be a bit misleading... they&#039;re looking at a change in trade costs at the margin and they find small gains from it. That doesn&#039;t tell us anything about the gains from trade in a larger context, i.e. versus autarky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that might be a bit misleading&#8230; they&#8217;re looking at a change in trade costs at the margin and they find small gains from it. That doesn&#8217;t tell us anything about the gains from trade in a larger context, i.e. versus autarky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

