Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Hufbauer and Lawrence: “Let’s Make a Deal”

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

In Foreign Affairs, Gary Hufbauer and Robert Lawrence posit a deal that they think would make concluding Doha feasible:

Many observers blame the complexity involved in getting 153 WTO members to reach consensus on an agenda with dozens of issues, but in fact the matter is far simpler. If China and the United States produced the sort of new offers described below, the momentum for a speedy agreement would be unstoppable.

Yet it appears that political considerations will prevent this from happening. US President Barack Obama pushed trade policy to the back burner while he concentrated on health care and financial reform. He needed nearly unanimous support from Democrats in Congress to enact his domestic agenda; trade agreements, meanwhile, are risky for Democratic politicians because many depend on unions, which wrongly believe that free trade means lost jobs. To counter such arguments, the Obama administration must demonstrate that trade agreements would boost US employment by doubling exports. The White House also needs strong support from Republicans, who tend to be allied with business. So far, US firms are lukewarm about the Doha Round because it seems to offer little from the large emerging economies, especially China…

These proposals could make the Doha Round a political winner: Major concessions by China and a few other emerging countries would be seen in the United States as evidence of greater access in markets that count. And China would advance its status as a full participant in the world trading system, while also positioning itself as the leader that delivered the benefits of the Doha agenda to all developing countries. The world would recover that much faster from the hangover of the Great Recession.

They want China to join the Government Procurement Agreement and liberalize services in exchange for the US recognizing China as a market economy and ending its annual compliance reviews. They also suggest that the US should end its cotton subsidies and ethanol tariffs. I doubt we’ll see these suggestions implemented any time soon.

NAFTA trucking dispute “rumbles toward a dead end”

Sunday, August 29th, 2010

The long-running NAFTA trucking dispute remains deadlocked. After 15 years, the US continues to refuse to allow Mexican trucks on US roads, citing safety concerns as cover for political motives. Cato’s Dan Ikenson says that Mexico is right to retaliate with tariffs after winning at both the NAFTA dispute settlement panel (2001) and the US Supreme Court (2004) and yet seeing little-to-no progress. But Washington insiders say the issue won’t be resolved any time soon.

Freedom fries: How attitudes shape trade flows

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

Guy Michaels & Xiaojia Zhi, 2010. “Freedom Fries,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol. 2(3), pages 256-81, July.

Do firms always choose the cheapest suitable inputs, or can group attitudes affect their choices? To investigate this question, we examine the deterioration of relations between the United States and France from 2002-2003, when France’s favorability rating in the US fell by 48 percentage points. We estimate that the worsening attitudes reduced bilateral trade by about 9 percent and that trade in inputs probably declined similarly, by about 8 percent. We use these estimates to calculate the average decrease in firms’ willingness to pay for French (or US) commodities when attitudes worsened.

[HT: Pierre-Louis]

Whither US trade policy?

Monday, May 31st, 2010

Bernard Gordon:

From a US government perspective, the Trans Pacific Partnership is the only game in town. Three main reasons explain why: the state of the WTO’s Doha Round; China’s role in Asia; and America’s self-image of its place in the Pacific. A possible fourth reason is that Washington regards the TPP is the only doable multilateral trade initiative…

For a United States that almost singlehandedly launched both the global GATT and then the WTO, a ‘Trans-Pacific Partnership’ is quite a comedown. All the more so when, if the WTO’s Doha Round were completed, its ‘most favoured nation’ clause would render moot most of the preferential trade agreements now cluttering world trade, and simultaneously kick-start global trade growth. And yet only the unlikely goal of a TPP, so 20th century, will be pressed by the US because that’s all the President is prepared to undertake at this point.

Read the whole thing. (HT: Larry.)

“This house believes the euro area will fragment over the next ten years”

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

At the Economist, Martin Feldstein and Charles Wyplosz debate the breakup of the eurozone.

Korean trade war

Monday, May 24th, 2010

South Korea is cutting off all trade with North Korea and will deny its neighbor access to sea lanes. The trigger was the sinking of a South Korean ship in March.

US Treasury delays April 15 currency manipulation report

Sunday, April 4th, 2010

Geithner:

I have decided to delay publication of the report to Congress on the international economic and exchange rate policies of our major trading partners due on April 15.  There are a series of very important high-level meetings over the next three months that will be critical to bringing about policies that will help create a stronger, more sustainable, and more balanced global economy.  Those meetings include a G-20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors meeting in Washington later this month, the Strategic and Economic Dialogue (S&ED) with China in May, and the G-20 Finance Ministers and Leaders meetings in June. I believe these meetings are the best avenue for advancing U.S. interests at this time.

Via Emmanuel.

Against the “startup visa”

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry:

About a year ago, Paul Graham of Y Combinator put out an idea for a Startup Visa that would allow foreign entrepreneurs to set up in the United States if they could raise enough money from institutional investors such as renowned business angels and VC firms…

Pretty much all the digerati are in love with the idea and believe it will finally allow immigrants to start companies in the US…

For one, getting the visa depends too much on investors. Investors already have too much power in the investor-entrepreneur relationship. If this act is passed, fundraising won’t just affect an entrepreneur’s company, but his or her life. You have to raise that round, or you’ll get deported!…

Another big problem with the Startup Visa Act is that it increases, rather than decreases, risk for the entrepreneurs. Launching a startup by definition means taking on a lot of risk: financial, reputational, you name it. The Startup Visa would increase risk for the entrepreneur by making the stakes so much bigger, by making literally everything depend on success — and not business success, but success how Congress defines it.

Via Tim Lee.

Obama and trade

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

Trade policy is back on the political radar, it seems. The NYT is covering it, at least. Pascal Lamy met with Tim Geithner and Ron Kirk today.

What is Obama’s trade strategy?

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Describing the USTR’s willingness to write a trans-Pacific PTA from scratch, Simon Lester says “I feel like we are getting close to seeing what the Obama trade folks have in mind for this one part of trade policy.”

When will find out what the Obama administration plans for any part of trade policy? I’ve stopped tracking day-to-day trade politics, so maybe I missed it, but I haven’t seen anything from the Obama folks about their plan for global economic engagement. Competitive liberalization may have been a bad idea, but at least the Bush administration made their strategy clear.